For photographers who are considering a new mirrorless camera, you might be looking at the Sony A6400 vs A6500 and wondering why pay a higher price for a newer model?
If it’s anything like other electronics, the differences are minimal and the price hike is enormous, right?
We’ll help you decide for yourself in this comparison review. We’ll highlight some of the similarities and differences, the pros and cons, and help you decide which type of photography is best suited for each of the two cameras in this comparison.
Sony A6400 vs A6500
You might think A6500 is the new, sleek model, but Sony’s just playing tricks on you. The A6500 was released back in 2016, the A6400 is the actual “newer” model which was recently released for photographers looking for the latest and greatest camera available. So, are there many differences you should be aware of before investing in the A6400 which was released early in 2019? Or, is it just buzz to hike up the pricing? Here we’ll highlight the primary differences and similarities between both models.
Obviously, there are some differences between both models, otherwise, why would Sony make a newer model? But, there are some similarities you should be aware of before paying more for a newer model camera. Some of the similarities between the A6400 and A6500 are
- Both utilize Wi fi and Bluetooth connectivity.
- Each model has an articulating screen.
- Built-in flash for low-light shooting is present in both cameras.
- Both feature a touchscreen and electric viewfinder.
- Face detection is present in both cameras.
- 24 MP resolution is the same and LCD screen resolution is 924k dots on both models
- Continuous shooting is 11 fps (frames per second) on both cameras
- Both feature a microphone port, environmental sealing, and AE bracketing
- NFC connection is present on both models, as is smartphone remote control
- 100 mbps video bitrate is the same on both models; both models can shoot 4K resolution and 30 fps video footage (can shoot 1080 p at up to 120 fps)
In terms of image quality, resolution, and video capabilities, both cameras perform relatively similar functions and deliver similar quality.
So, what distinguishes these two cameras? Some of the primary differences which are instantly noticed by photographers include
- ISO resolution is far superior on the A6400 ranging from 100 to 32000 and can expand up to 102800ISO resolution on the A6500 is 100 to 25600 and expands to 51200, so the ability to lighten/darken photos is half.
- The A6400 is much lighter and more compact, making it easier for shooting on the go (weighs 403 g vs 453 g on the A6500)
- The battery life is superior on the A6400, you can shoot about 60 more shots on a single charge (410 shots vs about 350 shots on the A6500)
- The A6400 features time-lapse recording with the optional app, the A6500 doesn’t offer this feature
- The A6400 has greater high ISO performance at 1431 vs 1405 on the A6500
- There’s a selfie-friendly LCD on the A6400, it rotates for taking selfies, this isn’t present on the A6500
- The A6400 features active animal eye AF tracking, so you can focus and lock in shooting animals, this isn’t present on the A6500
The Sony A6400 is marketed for those who enjoy social media, Youtube video creation and want to share on social media more so than its predecessor model. So, what are some of the best and worst features you should consider in comparing the Sony A6400 vs A6500? These are some of the A6400’s pros and cons.
Several great features and upgrades have been added to the new A6400 model. Some of the pros of choosing this camera include
- The design of the camera is a little thicker, thanks to the high-quality, upgraded display
- It’s lightweight at only 403 g
- The camera features a flip-up “Selfie” display so you can see yourself when holding the camera up (great for social media, shooting vlogs, etc.)
- It features a .39” OLED viewfinder with 2.59 million pixel resolution
- Auto-focus is spectacular on this camera; images come into focus in .02 seconds (in comparison to .05 on the A6500)
- Eye-based tracking is available (for humans and animals)
- Greater ISO range, for improvements in lightening/darkening photos
- It can shoot video in 4K as well as 1080 P, and the “Selfie” mode is great for video sharing through social media apps
- It has a weather-sealed body so it’s safe to use in rain, wind, dusty conditions, and other outdoor weather extremes
- It is compatible with a smartphone remote control, so you can instantly share, post, like, comment, and connect your photos and videos instantly
There are some drawbacks worth noting as it relates to the A6400 as well, some of these include
- It has a lower color depth rating (24.5 vs 24) in comparison to the A6500
- It doesn’t feature sensor-shift image stabilization, which is built into the A6500
- It is a little thicker than the A6500 (although this is because of the new viewfinder and design)
- The ergonomics/handling and grip are just average, other cameras are easier to manipulate
- It’s missing a headphone jack for audio mounting
Who it’s for
Ultimately, the A6400 is for the social media enthusiast, the daily vlogger, or those who love to share, post, and comment on photos and videos as they’re being posted. It’s a little lighter, the ISO makes it a little better for manipulating images, and the point and shoot capabilities are straightforward. It’s reasonably valued, and a good option for those who want to shoot video and images daily for social sharing.
Like the A6400, there are some great features, and some areas the camera’s lacking, which consumers should consider, before making their decision. These are some of the best and worst features of the A6500 to consider, as you’re comparing both models.
The camera offers several great features for the photographer looking for a reliable DSLR camera. Some of these benefits include
- For video shooting, it features the IBIS which helps with video stabilization; it can also shoot in 4K and 1080 p resolution
- It’s great for sport’s style or fast-paced image shooting with the sensor-shift image stabilization feature
- It has greater color depth and dynamic range than the A6400
- It has a slimmer body than the A6400, although it weighs about 50 g more
- It uses a mirrorless system and has the same great 24 MP resolution as the A6400
- It features a self-delay timer and max viewing angle of 76 degrees
- Features several shooting programs: landscape, portraits, sports, sunset, night, night portrait, etc.
- It has red-eye reduction, slow synchro, and rear curtain sync modes
- It’s superior at shooting faster-paced shots/images
Some of the drawbacks on this model include
- It’s missing the new “selfie” mode on the camera
- There’s no built-in head jack for audio mounting
- It has fewer special effects than the A6400
- It doesn’t have the mobile device, remote-controlled, remote line view, which is present in the A6400
Who it’s for
This camera is superior for the everyday photographer. It’s more versatile, the IBIS lets you shoot handheld, regardless of the lens you’re using, and it can shoot at fairly low shutter speeds, for optimal image control and quality. It has a very large burst buffer as well, making it far superior for sports shooting than the A6400.
Verdict: Sony A6400 vs A6500 Debate: Which is the Best of the Two Options?
Both cameras are excellent. And, both are priced at a similar price point. So, who’s the winner in the Sony A6400 vs A6500 battle? It’s a generational question perhaps. For those who want versatility, practicality, easy to use, point and shoot, the A6500 is your winner. Its no-frills approach, image-stabilization, ergonomic grip, gives owners ultimate control in capturing photos.
On the other hand, the millennial vlogger in you, who wants to share selfies, post the latest updates, capture videos while you travel, and share these shots immediately, will flock to the A6400. It is a shareable camera and one that makes it easy to instantaneously post and share, with the “selfie” mode, mobile remote control, and remote line views. For a younger generation who wants to share and post everything that’s going on, as it is unfolding, the A6400 is the better choice.